Agent observability

Every AI call.
Accounted for.

Follow the request from agent to provider. See its tokens, timing, owner, and catalog cost—without piecing the story together after the fact.

Follow a request

Powered by Caveman Platform · in private development

See the whole picture

A total is not an explanation.

One invoice.
A thousand unanswered
questions.

Which workflow ran up the bill?Was it the model or the retries?Who owns the next fix?

The whole story.
One trace.

A model call is one part of an agent workflow. Select a step below to inspect the request path and the facts recorded along the way.

trace / support-triageIllustrative request
Step 2 of 3

Provider call

Record model, reported usage, cache tokens, status, and latency.

48–1,248 ms

Timing, without the blind spot.

See latency and status alongside each request. Find the slow call rather than blaming the whole agent.

Usage, as reported.

Record input, output, and cached tokens from the provider. Preserve the basis of the calculation.

Work, with an owner.

Group requests by workflow and agent. Missing attribution remains visible.

Start with a number.
End with a name.

Explore a sample ledger. Switch between agents and workflows, then select a request to inspect the cost behind it.

Caveman / Spend explorerInteractive example
Priced subtotal$0.71
Requests4
Unpriced1
Request cost, in orderUSD · example values
unpriced01020304

Sample records only. Actual subtotals use public-catalog prices and provider-reported usage, not your negotiated provider invoice.

The trace is a fact.
The pattern is a lead.

Investigate related work, repeated paths, and recurring failure themes. Move from one expensive request to a case worth testing.

Workload analysis / task familyExample trace patterns
Repeated verification
01Read
02Verify
03Read
04Verify
05Answer

The same artifact gets read and verified twice. Inspect the traces before deciding whether either check is redundant.

Illustrative pattern analysis · themes require suitable captured evidence · lexical clusters are not labeled semantic

Content-based analysis depends on your capture settings and available evidence. Semantic themes and lexical traffic clusters have different bases; the product keeps that distinction visible.

Unlisted model—Unpriced

Missing price is not a zero-dollar call.

Unknown is not free.

An unpriced model stays unpriced. Missing catalog data never quietly becomes $0.

Workflow: repair-tests
JD
Engineering / JulesAgent: code-review

Attribution is explicit.

Give a request an owner—or leave it marked unattributed until you know.

Run receipt
Model calls2
Tool calls3
Stop reasonCompleted
Illustrative receipt

Every number has a basis.

Keep the request record close to the calculation. Estimates and verified savings remain separate.

Less dashboard
archaeology.

Open the request, inspect its timeline, and follow the work it belongs to. The record is already there when the question arrives.

Full payload visibility depends on your capture and retention settings. Request metadata and usage are distinct from captured content.

● ● ●
Demo workspace

Interactive product UI · fictional sample data · Open full demo ↗

Make every token count.

Stop guessing.
Start tracing.

Connect your existing LiteLLM gateway through OpenTelemetry, or use Caveman’s gateway. Caveman Platform is in private development.

Connect LiteLLM